Because we all know that it’s not Christmastime until we see how the Kardashians and the Jenners decided to come together for their annual Christmas card.
There’s a couple of interesting things here, I guess. Obviously, Kanye isn’t there, which is extremely upsetting, and also surprising. Don’t they realize how much more press they would get with this is he was on there? There’s not any trouble in Kimye paradise, is there? Heaven forbid Kim lose the latest love of her life, especially when she’s still married to her last one. Can you even imagine?
I guess the only other interesting thing is how much people care about these cards every year. When I was trying to find the best version of this photo, I found dozens and dozens of other blogs and news sites that already got the tip last night, and I don’t get it. And you know I’m not trying to do a big “why do people care about celebrities?” thing, or even a “why do people care about the Kardashians?” thing. People care about them because it’s fun to gossip, duh. But I don’t get why people care so much about these Christmas cards specifically. Is it just so we can speculate about Kim’s love life? Or to see what Bruce Jenner‘s face is up to? Because I can understand that. But otherwise, what’s the appeal?
It’s not Kim’s stupid greased back hair, that’s for sure.
December 18, 2012 at 4:30 am by Emily
There’s really not a whole lot to say here. Scott Disick went out for an afternoon on the town a few days ago, he wore this coat, and I don’t think it would be right to keep this from you.
Ok, to be honest, I think this is kind of glorious. Scott Disick is a major douche canoe most of the time, but his style never fails to make me smile. There was an episode of Kourtney and Kim Take New York where he went to a super fancy men’s store, and they sold ascots and pocket squares and other more classic items, and he bought a cane that he took everywhere. It annoyed the hell out of Kourtney though, so it was a major storyline for an episode. Well, that and Kim’s crumbling marriage. But the point is that Scott has always been known for being a bit foppish with his fashion, but this … this is something else altogether. This is amazing. Or at least it would be if I thought that he was wearing it for fun and not to make a big douchey statement.
For another angle, here’s a picture that Kim posted on Instagram:
What do you think?
May 28, 2012 at 6:30 am by Emily
This is really bizarre, ok? Are you ready for it?
Khloe Kardashian and Scott Disick had a minor spat on Khloe’s radio show in Dallas. That’s nothing new, of course. What is new, however, is that I am taking Scott’s side. Crazy, right? Just check out what went down:
Khloe Kardashian is a fan favorite, but she may have lost herself some followers when she used a gay slur during her March 8 “Mix Up w/ Khloe Kardashian Odom” radio show!
Khloe, 27, said the word on her program “Mix Up w/ Khloe Kardashian Odom” on Dallas radio stationMix 102.9. Kardashian family mainstay Scott Disick called in for an interview, and it was fun until Khloe made a VERY inappropriate comment while talking about Scott, 28, and his accessory choices.
“What kind of homo are you?” she asked. “Seriously? That is not what men…a straight man doesn’t carry a Birkin Bag.”
Scott quickly took offense to the statement, retorting, “Listen to me. First of all, you shouldn’t say homo on the radio. It’s not a bad thing to be a homosexual. You’re making it sound like a negative thing. Third I’m not a homosexual. Fourth, I didn’t come out of the closet. It’s a man bag.”
Instead of hanging her head in shame, Khloe then dug herself deeper on the issue, saying, “First of all, let me just tell you: I am the queen of my gay community which I love and adore. And I promote doing the tranny look-alike contest. I am queen bee over here so don’t even try it.”
Of course Khloe Kardashian is my favorite Kardashian, and I think Scott’s a major asshole, though lately he seems to be getting his life together. That’s what makes this so weird, the role reversal. I wouldn’t have thought that Khloe and Scott would ever have an exchange where I went “wow, Khloe, you need to take a listen to Scott Disick,” but I just did.
I mean, besides the obvious offensive slur, it’s just so insanely immature to call a dude a homo for carrying a purse. I get wanting to rag on somebody, but come up with a better way to do it that I didn’t hear about a zillion times in middle school, and maybe focus on something that doesn’t offend the community of which you claim to be the queen. Also, if you’re going to pick on a guy, don’t pick on him for being smart enough to understand the amazing convenience of the purse. It just doesn’t makes sense.
What do you guys think? Scott totally comes out of this looking like the better person, am I right? Does that blow your mind as much as it blows mine?
March 12, 2012 at 5:30 am by Emily
No, no – we don’t wish that Johnny Depp and Vanessa Paradis would snap it off (generally). But in light of all of the lost love in the world, we decided to compile a list of 5 couples that we wish the ultimate demise upon: the big breakup. What with Seal and Heidi Klum calling it quits, and Johnny Depp and Vanessa Paradis (and, of course, you can’t forget – sniff, sniff – Kim Kardashian and Kris Humphries), we thought it prudent to really stick it to those who deserve it, rather than those who should just be together for the rest of their lives for the public’s sake.
In no particular order, The List:
#5 – Courtney Stodden and Doug Hutchison
OK, no one’s going to disagree with me on this one, right? Their relationship, frankly speaking, is weird and unnatural and honestly, pretty damn gross. Not that I, you know, sit around and fantasize about celebrities having sex (I do have other things to do, my friends), but even trying to think about these two in the sack takes my appetite away. And that’s a hard, hard thing to do these days, guys.
#4 – Ryan Gosling and Eva Mendes
Because, duh. Who wants to continue seeing these two sucking face all over chic European countries and West Coast bistros? Not this girl, that’s for damn sure. Ryan needs to go back to his roots of down-home sweetness and women with genteel manners and … I don’t know, f-cking hoop skirts or something. Eva Mendes is just not where all that is at.
#3 – Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux
I don’t know about you guys, but it seems to me that Jennifer only dates a high-ish profile man is when she’s in the throes of promoting one of her films. As far as I know, she doesn’t have anything important coming down the line as of yet, so I fully expect these two to completely drop off the radar sometime in 2012. Plus, Jennifer Aniston is just (more) annoying (than usual) when she’s dating anyone, really. Sorry, girl, but some people just aren’t meant to be.
*Image courtesy of Celebuzz
#2 – Jennifer Lopez and Casper Smart
Again, I don’t want to wish ill upon anyone and their, you know, “true love that transcends age, generation, and backup dancer syndrome,” but this is just silly. I realize that J. Lo is a big girl and can string along a young kid if she wants, throwing money at him all the while like she’s the female P. Diddy, but they’ve only been dating for something like weeks now and I’m already sick of hearing about them. Go and celebrate and get married and disappear forever, guys, or break the hell up and get off my mind.
#1 – Kourtney Kardashian and Scott Disick
I don’t know, is it in poor taste to wish relational demise upon a woman who’s expecting a child? I don’t think so, considering who she’s with. I’m not a big Kardashian-lover as it is, but if there’s anyone who’s bad news, it’s the American Psycho-looking Scott Disick, who always seems to be just one mildly angry outburst away from relapsing into full-blown alcoholism and mirror-smashing. You wanna raise your kiddos around a ticking time-bomb, Kourt? I sure wouldn’t.
What about you guys – anyone in Hollywood you’d like to see cut their ties this year? Anyone on this list you hope lasts, you know, forever and ever?
January 24, 2012 at 7:30 am by Sarah
Ugh. This is bad. This is so, so bad. This is definitely the worst Christmas card the Kardashians have had so far, and I’d know. We ran almost their entire collection here last year around this time.
So here it is. And for all of you lucky bastards out there who just love 3D, and who’re so rich (like the Kardashians) that you have stupid, senseless things around your house like 3D glasses, the shoot was done in 3D, TOO. You should probably play the lottery tonight, you know. This type of serendipity just doesn’t come along that often.
Me, I’m still trying to figure out the theme here. Is it “Have a Bad Photoshop Christmas”? Is it “Let’s pretend Kourtney has even half the ass that Kim does so happy holidays you bastard”? Is it “Ho! Ho! Ho! How ’bout we make Kris Humphries SOOOO JEALOUS that he missed the Christmas card by a few weeks by making the (cottage) cheese stand alone?” I don’t know. Maybe. My guess is that they were going for Marrakesh “classy” this time, but it never fails to amuse me that they confuse “classy” with “klassy,” and really, how appropriate is that?
December 19, 2011 at 3:30 pm by Sarah
First of all, you did know that a remake of American Psycho is in the works, right? And I know, the original was made in 2000, why is a remake happening, so on and so forth. But we can’t waste time discussing that now. Because now, there’s a somewhat solid chance that Scott Disick will play the lead role of Patrick Bateman. And that’s just too much.
Here’s what Bret Easton Ellis, author of the American Psycho novel, had to say via Twitter:
Scott retweeted both of those statements, along with his approval of Bret’s wishes. And just in case you think Mr. Bret Easton Ellis was being silly, let me just inform you that last night he also Tweeted about Kourtney and Kim Take New York, which I think is extremely telling.
Ok, now don’t hate me, but I can actually see it. Scott Disick’s entire being just screams Patrick Bateman, doesn’t it? I mean, there’s the look, of course, but somehow I could see Scott being convincing as a serial killer. On top of that, he’s also dropped some references in the past that showed his awareness of the similarities. I’m not saying that he should get the role or that he would have the ability to do it, I’m just saying that I can see where all this is coming from.
What do you guys think? Would you watch Scott Disick as Patrick Bateman? Are you pumped for the remake? Did you see the original? Let’s talk about it.