Oh what fun!
FUN FUN FUN!
Gisele Bundchen’s on her honeymoon with Tom Brady in Vancouver. Why would people with all the money in the world go on honeymoon in Vancouver and not, say, Fiji? Well, because Bridget Moynahan is filming a movie there, and I assume she’s got custody of that kid something like 95% of the time, and you better believe she enforces that mess. But for the two hours of the day that Tom has little John in his custody, he and Gisele made damn sure the photogs got snaps of them being such good parents.
I’ll reiterate exactly what Bridget planted in the press last month: You never see pictures of her with that baby. And whenever Tom and Gisele have the baby, the photogs are somehow right there and ready to snap away. Coincidence? No.
April 29, 2009 at 9:28 am by Evil Beet
Bridget Moynahan has been verrrrrry quiet in recent years, as Gisele Bundchen parades about the world carrying her child and giving stupid quotes to magazines about how she considers the child her own. Props to Bridget for that. However, she’s not above letting her “friends” “leak” some quotes about all this nonsense.
A source close to the 37-year-old model-actress [says], “Bridget has her own life, she doesn’t need to be involved in the drama of all this, and she finds it disrespectful that her son is being paraded around in front of the paparazzi when she’s specifically made it a point of keeping him away from that.”
The source went on to say pointedly, “I can count on two hands, in two years, the number of times Bridget has been photographed with that baby. I can count on two hands the number of times in the past month that Gisele has been photographed with that baby.”
In an even more personal attack, the source said, “If Tom is such a great father as everyone likes to say, then you would think that he’d respect the privacy of his young child and would ask his wife not to use his son as a publicity prop and a subject of public discussion.”
Damn! But it’s true. I personally am a little nauseated when I see Gisele toting around that little boy for the cameras. I’m glad that she’s bonding with him — obviously a child deserves as much love as he can get — but in front of the cameras, and the way she talks about him in interviews, is really, really annoying. I can’t even imagine how mad it makes Bridget. Kick her ass, Bridget!!!
April 3, 2009 at 1:17 pm by Evil Beet
One of her close friends, who you know was totally reading off index cards that Bridget wrote out for her, said, “If Gisele loved Bridget’s child like he was ’100 percent her own,’ then she would not talk about him in the press. Discretion and respect are not either of Gisele or Tom’s virtues, as was evidenced even when the child was still unborn and they publicly flaunted their relationship without any discretion whatsoever. Don’t you think Jack will grow up and read her comments and find them disrespectful to him and his mother? If Tom is such a great father as everyone likes to say, then you would think that he’d respect the privacy of his young child and would ask his wife not to use his son as a publicity prop and a subject of public discussion. Is she is so desperate for attention that she can’t find anything more productive to talk about other than Bridget’s child?”
Personally, I couldn’t get past the part where Gisele called Tom and Bridget’s son “it.” As in, “I understand that he has a mom, and I respect that, but to me it’s not like because somebody else delivered him, that’s not my child. I feel it is, 100 percent.” As a mother, I am here to tell you that the only time you call your kid “it” is when you are pregnant and they have just made you puke for the sixth time before noon. Once born, calling your child “it” is considered somewhat declasse.
April 1, 2009 at 7:12 am by Wendie
After 14 months of pregnancy, actress Bridget Moynahan at last gave birth to Tom Brady’s bastard child.
The baby boy was born in LA on Wednesday.
“Both mother and baby are doing well,” said Moynahan’s publicist.
Tom Brady, who is currently dating Gisele Bunchen, may or may not have been with her. His whereabouts are hard to pin down right now — he didn’t appear at The Patriots’ practice on Wednesday. He said earlier this week that he wanted to take a few days off when the child was born, calling it “a very joyous, happy situation.” Although it’s perfectly likely that, upon hearing the news of the birth, Gisele had him kidnapped and taken out of the country for a little while so he didn’t accidentally bond with another woman’s child.
August 23, 2007 at 10:07 am by Evil Beet
How has this baby not been born yet? I feel like she’s been pregnant forever. The babies who were born back when she first got pregnant are already old enough to have sex with Tom Brady. Pop out that kid already, Bridg.
August 9, 2007 at 11:13 am by Evil Beet
Everyone seemed to be in a genuinely good mood on Sunday at the Disney-sponsored event to support the Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation in Westwood.
Jamie-Lynn Spears was there with an unidentified guest (a boyfriend, maybe? Anyone know who this Abercrombied hottie is?), and, boy, she must just be really happy that it’s not her sister in jail right now. A very pregnant Bridget Moynahan was goofing around with an adorable Molly Sims. Lauren Conrad showed up with Audrina Patridge (not surprisingly, there was no Heidi Montag in sight). Carmen Electra showed up, as did ex-hubby Dave Navarro (wearing the most adorable little shirt — I’m pretty sure I got the same one at Banana Republic a few seasons ago). Brooke Burke even brought a cowboy hat. And, of course, my darling Ashley Tisdale, once again investing her time and energy in charity rather than partying.