Anna Paquin has always been open about her bisexuality, but many people assumed she’d “gone straight” on us since she married her True Blood co-star Stephen Moyer and had twins with him. Obviously that’s not the case, so when Larry King asked about Anna’s “former” sexuality, she had to set him straight on a few things.
From Larry King Live (via US Weekly):
“Are you a non-practicing bisexual?” King, 80, asked.
“Well, I mean, I am married to my husband, and we happy monogamously married,” the Oscar winner, 32, replied.
“But you were bisexual?” King continued.
“Well, I don’t think it’s a past tense thing,” Paquin answered, laughing. “Are you still straight if you’re with somebody? Doesn’t mean you’re not, if you were to break up with them or you were to die. It doesn’t prevent your sexuality from existing. It doesn’t really work like that.”
Well, duh. And you’d think someone like Larry King has been on the earth enough to understand this, but I suppose that’s expecting too much. Love me some Anna Paquin, though.
August 4, 2014 at 9:30 am by Jennifer
Anna Paquin is done with Sookie from True Blood, so now it’s time to change up her look a bit and get down with the kids or whatever… which is, I suppose, why she decided to dye her hair bright purple.
It does look pretty cute, actually – I would love to do something like that, but the time to lighten my hair enough to do it – not to mention the upkeep and the fact that I do have to go out in the real world and am a grown adult – really puts me off.
What do you think? Stephen Moyer seems to like it!
— Stephen Moyer (@_smoyer) July 16, 2014
— Anna Paquin (@AnnaPaquin) July 16, 2014
July 17, 2014 at 8:00 am by Jennifer
Anna Paquin shot a scene as the character Rogue for the upcoming X-Men movie, X-Men: Days of Future Past, (lol wtf is that title) — but unfortunately, no one’s going to see it. At least, not in theaters. Director Bryan Singer hopes it will show up on DVD. Here’s why her scene — her one and only scene — got cut. As Singer told Entertainment Weekly,
Through the editing process, the sequence became extraneous. It’s a really good sequence and it will probably end up on the DVD so people can see it. But like many things in the editing process, it was an embarrassment of riches and it was just one of the things that had to go. Unfortunately, it was the one and only sequence Anna Paquin was in, the Rogue character was in. Even though she’s in the materials and part of the process of making the film, she won’t appear in it.
She [Paquin] did a fantastic job. She was awesome in the sequence. She’s a brilliant actress. I would work with her in a heartbeat.
She completely understood [about the cut]. It’s very disappointing, but she’s very professional and she knows that stuff happens, particularly with material you shoot early on in production. Films evolve.
Bummer for her. And for fans? Will you guys miss her? I guess one bright side is she won’t have to promote the film and can spend more time with her twin babies.
Here are some supercute pics of her and husband Stephen Moyer (BIEEEELL) from earlier this month. They made my heart melt. Enjoy.
December 23, 2013 at 5:30 am by Catherine St. Ives
The True Blood twins have arrived.
“We can confirm that Anna Paquin and Stephen Moyer recently welcomed their twins into the world,” reps for the actors tell PEOPLE exclusively.
“The babies were born a few weeks early, but are in good health and both Mom and Dad are overjoyed.”
Wow. That seems like the shortest gestation period ever, right? We found out that Anna was pregnant back in April, and shortly after, found out that she was having twins, and wow. That time in between sure flew, huh? I just hope that everyone’s really OK, because while twins sometimes do come early, it sounds like these little ones came more than just “a few weeks.” Do the math—even if Anna was two months pregnant when she announced her pregnancy (which may even be a stretch, because women who become pregnant with twins often show pretty early on and when she made her announcement, there was hardly a bulge, let alone a bump, in sight), that’d make her only seven or so months pregnant.
Or hell, even throw all the math out the window, because I f-cking count on my fingers anyway, let’s take a look at the most recent photo we have of Anna—which is that picture, up at the top of this post. This photo was only taken two weeks ago. And if you’ve ever seen a lady carrying twins, she’s often way, way huge.
Them’s be tiny babies—cute babies, but tiny babies, nonetheless!
Congratulations, guys! I think you’ll make a great mama, Anna!
September 12, 2012 at 5:30 am by Sarah
Oh my goodness, how adorable is a pregnant Anna Paquin? Holy God.
If you guys didn’t already know, Anna‘s pregnant with two fetuses, and I have no doubts that those two fetuses will be just as adorable as Anna herself (even though some of you don’t exactly share my sentiments about how adorable Anna actually is).
I’m just going to leave these photos here with you guys, because I don’t know about where you’re at, but we’re getting some pretty kick-ass storms that have been regularly knocking out my internet service, and I want to get this bad boy up before I lose another three hours of access.
Anna Paquin baby bump, whee!
August 25, 2012 at 2:00 pm by Sarah
I know that’s not really new news, because we’ve known that Anna‘s having twins for a few weeks now, but damn. Look at that bump! She just announced her pregnancy back in April, and I realize that she’s having twins, so she’s going to have a much larger bump than, say, someone who was only baking one baby pie in there, but how far along is she already? Wow.
One way or the other, she sure looks gorgeous.