Feature

- Adrien Brody. Shirtless. Cannes.

- Baby's Sex Revealed: Snooki's Having a ...

- CAPTION THIS and Win Stuff from Evil Beet!

- Guess the Celebrity Nails!

- Celebrities Without Makeup: Guess Who?

- Check Out Ryan Gosling's 'Gangster Squad' Trailer

- Who's Hotter: Courtney Stodden or Mom?

- Rihanna v. Chris Brown: A Brand-New Feud

- More Accusers Come Forward Against John Travolta

- Johnny Depp: "I am not single."

- 5 Best Dressed at the 2012 Met Gala

- Win Amazon Gift Cards!

- Everyone *Finally* Hates Kim Kardashian

- PHOTOS: Lindsay Lohan's 'Glee' Stills

- Guess the Ill-Dressed Celebrity!
Sep 12, 2011 at 02:30 pm by Sarah

Rihanna? Why Rihanna? And why would they allow Rihanna to pose in their panties wearing that hair? SHE LOOKS LIKE A PUMPKIN, FFS. I have positively no doubts that Armani could have afforded some kind of natural-looking weave or even a damned wig from the stock room of Spencer’s Gifts (is that frigging place even open anymore?) and it would have looked oodles better than this … catastrophe. I can’t even appreciate the fine body that Rihanna obviously has because I’m too damned busy gawking at the hair that my brother rocked when he was five.
Good Lord, y’all.
Images courtesy of TooFab















































































































Well, she has roughly eight billion hairstyles and seems to change them every second or so.
I don’t think this one looks bad in black & white, but I’d like to see some shots in color.
I’m afraid she’d look like she’s wearing a speed racer helmet; or she looks like a Romulan. Maybe she’s just a big Star Trek fan. (badoomp-boomp pishhh)
do for ur man chris baby u r his fuckin cotises
i want to see chris next to u babz
when i see u and chris ur my fans but when i see u alone am like were is chris u gays r my love world
Boring. It will be a miracle the day she is photographed without trying so fucking hard to be the ultimate bombshell, which she isn’t.