Today's Evil Beet Gossip
HOT TOPICS: Kim Kardashian Lindsay Lohan Justin Bieber

Any Lurking Bi-Curiousness Has Officially Been Eradicated From My Brain

January 17, 2009
Wendie
Madonna
111 Comments

56283296madonna117200983131am

Okay, this has been a really traumatic morning for me.  I woke up to pictures of Linda Hogan in lederhosen.  You, at least, are getting a warning as to what is in store for you.  I was blindsided. 

After I recovered, courtesy of a Screwdriver, I learned that a naked picture of Madonna, circa 1979, is up for auction through Christie’s auction house.  I couldn’t figure out why this is newsworthy.  Didn’t anyone buy the Sex book?  Madonna, naked, $9,950 cheaper than this Christie’s picture is expected to go for.  Then, I clicked THE LINK.  Be warned:  1)  Obviously NSFW and 2) There is a zoom feature which will bring you very disturbing results.

111 CommentsLeave a comment

  • Oh Wow. That poor woman has children. She is like old as dirt and still dresses the way she does. That should be deemed cruel and unusual punishment. No one wants to see their granny in fishnets!

  • Or I should say those poor children have to call that woman their mother! And they let her adopt a kid too?! They’d probably come to my house and tell me it was to messy to adopt a kid or something but she can spread her legs for photos at 50+ in those leotards and she’s still deemed a suitable mother.

      • I know. But did you see the one of her legs all spread for some product or something. It is still disturbing.

    • You really think posing provocatively in a picture makes her a bad mother?

      Do you have children? Maybe wasting your time reading celebrity gossip instead of tending to your children makes you a bad mother.

      Just a thought.

  • yeeeow.

    1) do you think there’s some kind of unconcious cultural backlash..or whatever(i had a very late night)…and that’s why the sight of so much pubic hair on a celebrity is now more shocking than if shaven? ’cause i was shocked, and i don’t know why. i don’t practice or exactly advocate being all porno bare but i just couldn’t stop staring.

    2) that being said i wasn’t prepared for one ONCE CLICK of the zoom to put me face first in her vajay-jay.

    • That is just a LOT of hair… seriously that is a freakish amount of hair. I honestly think she has more pubic hair than my husband! Poor, poor Lourdes!

      • It explains a lot about Lourdes’ um, eyebrow, though. I always wondered why her facial hair was so thick. I guess thick hair runs in the family. :|

  • and the hair under her armpits. Very european. I personally would buy this photo to keep it OUT of the public eyes. Mine are burning.

  • My girlfriend told me about a time she did acid and, while tripping, hallucinated that her pubic hair was eating her legs. I would imagine that this picture is exactly how she felt.

  • She has Lourdes’s eyebrows. . .ON HER LABIA!!!! I agree with thehappyapple, I guess thick hair does run in the family. (now leaves computer to take a shower and wash herself with bleach while in fetal position)

  • Good god (wo)man!!! That was repugnant. I have the hairiest bear of a husband and she puts him to shame. He looks like a Chinese Crested compared to her–and those armpits. I think, she thinks she is a man or something.

  • When I zoomed – because of course I did – strangely, I was more disturbed by the thickness and coarseness of the hair on her legs than on her snatch. Go figure.

    Not to say that isn’t some extreme sasquatch business going on. I mean, I agree with Amy Poehler – hair down there is a back up plan for underwear, so I’m not usually too distressed by the natural. But she could braid that shit and climb out of a really, really high tower Rapunzel-style if she needed to.

  • That is some angry, angry pubic hair. I know it was the 70’s and I understand that she has Italian heritage, but WOW.

    And thanks to the zoom feature I am now considering having my corneas harvested.

  • Seventies Porn Bush. Smokin’. Let’s hope THAT trend will not resurface. Can you imagine bikini season with the crotch beasts poppin’ out? *shudder*

  • I’m so sick of madonna. she doesn’t wear age appropriate clothes and she should just admit already that she can’t be prancing around in half naked outfits anymore. she’s like the old mom trying to be hip.

  • you know, nobody’s mentioned the fact that she didn’t shave anything else in those times… the armpits? the leg hair you can see? if she was letting things run wild, i’m kind of stunned that the vag is that composed.

  • shes so damn hairy. it like travels down her leg a little.

    thats not normal.

    i cant believe i just zoomed in on madonnas vag.

  • @ the above picture: Her legs are disgustingly muscular. And that outfit? Trashy as hell. She really is a whore.

  • wow, i’m surprised everybody’s comments have been negative. did everybody hate this, or was it only the people who hated it who felt like commenting?

    i really think the picture’s beautiful.

    • I didn’t hate it, I just wasn’t expecting all that in one photo. I think Madonna has always been beautiful, but that’s beyond a natural look when it comes to pubes.

    • I get that the wild grown pubes is a sore sight, especially by today’s super-shaved, plucked and botoxed standard of beauty. But I think her boobs look great and her skin looks soft and she had a great body, even back then before she started working out ridiculously. People just really f-ing HATE Madonna for some reason. I’ve never really understood why. They just love to insult her.

      • Not just today’s standards. Back when this was new my brothers were gagging over it. My mind just went blank. There was 2 nude pics my brothers gagged over, this one and the Dynasty chick who had hair around her nipples. Does anyone remember who she was? Black hair, really pretty, ring of hair around her nipples.

  • I saw the picture last night and deeply regret zooming. It’s like a super human vagina, like 4 vaginas in one coming at you. *Shiver*

  • one thing, though?
    if you click the enlarge thing, the image that comes up has control buttons for zooming in on different parts of the photo, stuff like that.
    and the up arrow is pointing straight up her vagina.
    in case anyone was interested in that immature observation.

  • Is this supposed to be artsy or something? Cause I don’t see any ‘art’ on spreading your legs while showing arms, legs and chacha unshaven. Not at all.

  • …gotta pity the lady who has to WAX that thing!!! They must close down shop for the afternoon in order to attack that hairy beast!!

  • there’s a lot of haters on this board. i imagine many of you are in denial about the amount of body hair you possess. she was a young girl when this picture was taken and, despite the tragicomedy that her life has become, had probably no idea that this picture would ever be worth $10,000-$15,000 on auction. when someone is willing to pay that much to see a picture of any of you naked, let me know. by the way, she was phenomenal breasts.

  • It would be a beautiful photo had she not spread her legs wide open like that. No one wants to see your See-You-Next-Tuesday, that up close and personal. But she loves to shock, even way back then. Hope Rocco and David never come across that image, it’ll scar them for life.

  • OH GOD. my eyes. even if she didn’t want to wax, there is this thing called trimming. it was like there was a schitzu between her legs. there is absolutely no need for that much hair. on the plus side, she does have great boobs.

  • Her legs are spread in all her new Louis Vuitton ads, too. What the hell? Seems it’s her nasty habit of many years.

    So. Much. HAIR.

  • That woman needs therapy. Obviously there is some history of trauma with razors, depillatories, wax, or electrolysis deeply submerged in her psyche.

    Or perhaps that’s just a pair of angora underpants.

  • Surprised and disappointed by how disgusted everyone is by seeing a natural woman. Yes it’s a lot of bush but nothing to be disgusted with, it’s how the body is supposed to look. She’s a woman.

    • Thank you PC. I was beginning to worry reading all of the above, as I don’t look too different than that *down there* and never once had any complaints about it. I thought that was what most women probably looked like unless they shaved it ALL off. Why do so many follow the opinion of some of these posts like sheeple?

    • No kidding. What the hell is everyone’s problem with pubic hair? Shaved vaginas look like prepubescent vaginas.

      You can put me in the camp of deviants who get aroused by adult women.

  • ah, god, thats disgusting. how can that even b comfortable?she needs to jump into a bath tub full of nair.

  • My eyes!!!! omg my eyezzzzzz!!!!

    I flinched for a second.

    yikes, thats what i call a fur-burger.

  • People. The picture was taken 30 YEARS ago. NOBODY shaved their pubes then. Your bitching makes no sense.

    It’s like looking at a picture of a guy from 1893 and going “Eww, look at that disgusting handlebar mustache! What was that dude thinking?”

    30 years from now, when shaving pubes is out, people are gonna see pics of Brit-Brit’s bare snatch and say “I just threw up in my mouth, her love hole looks like a little girl’s!”.

  • everybody’s been totally distracted by hair… have you noticed a gigantic wart or cyst on the left side under the pubes?

  • At first I was thinking she needs to stop wearing outfits like this, then I saw the picture and was thinking you know what I am okay with the clothes infact please, please don’t take them off…

  • Really poor kids… Not because she is dressed like this, no way, but because she is brainwashing them into shitty kabbalah…

  • Oh sweet fuck!!! My eyes……my poor eyes!

    C’mon, it’s like Don King is in a scissor lock between her legs! That can’t be real!

  • Am I the only one who does not find this picture disturbing? This is a honest picture and any average adult woman would look like this (granted some would have less hair, others even more) if she wouldn’t shave off her hair to please spoiled men who grew up masturbating to unnatural shaved pussies.
    The only thing I find disturbing is people’s reactions to a realistic and natural depiction of a woman’s body.

  • The current photo of Madonna in fishnets is a cry for help. People in her circle who are telling her she looks amazing are evil monsters.

  • Ok, this woman is from the US, not France. Even back in the late 70s and 80s women in this country at least shaved their legs and armpits! That is just GROSS!