Feature

- Adrien Brody. Shirtless. Cannes.

- Baby's Sex Revealed: Snooki's Having a ...

- CAPTION THIS and Win Stuff from Evil Beet!

- Guess the Celebrity Nails!

- Celebrities Without Makeup: Guess Who?

- Check Out Ryan Gosling's 'Gangster Squad' Trailer

- Who's Hotter: Courtney Stodden or Mom?

- Rihanna v. Chris Brown: A Brand-New Feud

- More Accusers Come Forward Against John Travolta

- Johnny Depp: "I am not single."

- 5 Best Dressed at the 2012 Met Gala

- Win Amazon Gift Cards!

- Everyone *Finally* Hates Kim Kardashian

- PHOTOS: Lindsay Lohan's 'Glee' Stills

- Guess the Ill-Dressed Celebrity!

So when was the last time that YOU saw photos of a movie premiere that hosted so many attractive young ladies? Because the last time I remember seeing this many pretty, successful young women gracing the screen, it was for Now and Then. And you just hold your tongue right there, friend, because that. Was a good movie.
This is also the main difference between Now and Then and Sucker Punch. SP is supposedly filled with gratuitous heaving cleavage, short-shorts, and deflowering of innocent women, and Now and Then? Was just way classier. I’m not saying that SP is a bad movie to see – I just won’t see it. But that’s because my tastes don’t generally run toward movies like Hellboy and Iron Man.







































































































































It’s comical how airbrushed the movie posters are…3/4 of the girls don’t look anything like themselves on the posters. They’re not ugly in real life so I don’t get why they decided to air brush the shit out of them into unrecognizable cartoon women
I loved Now and then too but, although I think the young cast killed it, the older cast (playing the kids later in life) sucked big time…