Lindsay Lohan is getting Godfather-y on us. Here’s what happened: Paris Hilton‘s younger brother, Barron Hilton, was attacked at a party in a mansion in Miami in the very early morning hours. Here’s TMZ’s photo of the damage done to his face:
Barron is claiming that Lohan was behind the attack — that she ordered someone to beat him up.
Here’s what we know. Though Lohan is claiming she had nothing to do with it and wasn’t even there, TMZ has 13 seconds of video of her mocking Barron moments after he was beaten.
Here’s their report. From TMZ:
We’re told … during the party, someone accused Barron of talking smack about Lindsay — and a short time later he was attacked and beaten to a pulp.
Barron told cops Lindsay approached him at the party with a male friend and began screaming, “‘You talk sh*t about me to my boyfriend, this is what you get.”
As the guy proceeded to pummel Barron, Hilton claims Lindsay was laughing and egging him on.
Cops were called to the scene and interviewed Barron. We’re told Barron doesn’t know the identity of his attacker but is adamant Lindsay is the person behind the attack.
We spoke to Michael Lohan who insists Lindsay had nothing to do with the attack and had left the mansion BEFORE the fight went down.
Guys, I have NO IDEA who to believe here. What boyfriend would Lohan be referring to? She insisted she was too busy to have one. The whole thing is bizarre.
Who do YOU believe?
December 8, 2013 at 8:30 am by Catherine St. Ives
Lindsay Lohan was reportedly seen holding hands with Liam Neeson’s 18-year-old son, Michael, but she’s insisting they’re “just friends.” Again, I say that’s practically admitting, “yeah, we’re doing it” because what the hell could your friendship be based on? He’s a teenager and you’re pushing 30. Her other excuse is that she’s too busy to bang. From TMZ:
According to sources, Lindsay’s laughing off reports she’s hooking up with Liam Neeson’s 18-year-old son, Michael … claiming they’re only friends and have been for quite a while.
Instead, we’re told Lohan is laser-focused on her sobriety and her career … plus, she’s spending at least 2-3 days a week shooting her docu-series for Oprah’s network.
There is definitely something going on, that is if you believe the reports that she was seen taking him by the hand into a club restroom, which I do.
December 6, 2013 at 6:30 am by Catherine St. Ives
Lindsay Lohan was rumored to be dating a football player and now the latest gossip is that she’s fooling around with Liam Neeson‘s son, Michael — who is eighteen years of age. Page Six reported seeing them holding hands on the way to the ladies room in a club. From Page Six:
The two were spotted Friday partying at hot spot Finale, where spies tell us they snuck off to the women’s bathroom together at one point.
[...] the troubled actress, who completed rehab this summer, has moved on to Michael, son of late actress Natasha Richardson and Neeson and grandson of Vanessa Redgrave.A source said: “Lindsay seems to have this thing for younger men at the moment.“They were together at a house party of one of Lindsay’s stylist friends before Thanksgiving, and were together at Finale on Friday. Lindsay was seen leading him into the women’s bathroom, hand-in-hand…”
But a rep for Neeson insisted “it’s not true” that Lohan and the actor’s son are romantically linked. Lohan’s rep told us, “Lindsay is friends with Michael but they are not dating.”
Yeah, I don’t believe that they’re “dating” either. But I would totally buy that they were “hooking up”, as the kids say. I believe that they go to karaoke bars and make out in the corner and then possibly do stuff to each other later. Lohan is 27, by the way. She’s almost 10 years older than he is. This normally wouldn’t matter if the younger party wasn’t 18, and especially a dude, as dudes are more immature to begin with. Doing stuff with an 18-year-old is a real bad idea, Lohan. I’m not even sure how they could be “just friends” because what the hell would they talk about? What do they have in common? I guess Lindsay is still 18 at heart, so maybe it works out.
December 4, 2013 at 3:30 pm by Catherine St. Ives
Lindsay Lohan can’t go too long without a court case, so this time she’s initiated one herself. You see, our dear friend Lilo has snorted enough Class A drugs that she actually believes the Grand Theft Auto V character above is based on her and since she didn’t give them permission to use her image, she’s suing. Uhhhhh….
Sources tell us, Lohan’s lawyers are currently crafting a lawsuit — demanding Rockstar Games pay some serious money for using Lindsay’s image in the game.
So the question … did ‘GTAV’ really use Lindsay. Here’s the evidence:
– The video game cover shows a woman holding a cellphone who looks Lindsay-ish. There’s been debate over whether it looks more like Kate Upton or Shelby Welinder.
– Part of the game features a mission where a Lindsay Lohan look-alike asks the player to take her home and escape the paparazzi.
– Another part of the game shows another Lindsay-like character at a hotel resembling the Chateau Marmont hotel in West Hollywood — a place Lindsay not only frequents but once lived at — and the mission is to photograph her having sex on camera.
I mean… so no one else that’s female is ever allowed to go to the Chateau Marmont or they’re copying Lindsay? Lindsay is the only person who deals with the paparazzi? It’s all so ridiculous, and frankly, this character looks wayyyyyy more like Kate Upton, anyway – don’t you think?
December 2, 2013 at 6:30 am by Jennifer
November 29, 2013 at 5:30 pm by Catherine St. Ives
Bret Easton Ellis, novelist (Less Than Zero, American Psycho) wrote the screenplay for the suckfest known as The Canyons, and he’s blaming Lindsay Lohan for its suckage. He’s not saying that she was bad in it. He’s saying that the problem is, basically, that she even existed. Here’s what he said on his podcast, via Radar:
I think where we went wrong was with the casting of Lindsay Lohan. Now I don’t mean she wasn’t good in it, she was very good in the movie. I mean that suddenly The Canyons has become the Lindsay Lohan film.
And Lindsay’s reputation followers her everywhere. And the moment that we casted Lindsay Lohan, the movie became something else. It stopped becoming the DIY movie that could make it into part of the trainwreck of the Lindsay Lohan narrative. And we thought the movie was ultimately going to step out of that shadow, that it was going to speak for itself and that people would be more interested in how we made this movie… But we didn’t. We didn’t step out of the Lindsay Lohan shadow, and it did affect the way the movie was perceived.
I think the hatred for the movie when it initially came out was so disproportionate to what the movie actually was… I think at a certain point, people were rooting for the movie to fail. And I think that’s why when the movie was eventually released, people were gleeful about massacring it.
Dude. Your movie? Sucked. It was like watching a very painful very slow very boring student film. If you’re gonna blame anyone for that, blame director Paul Schrader.
Did you see it? Thoughts?