From New York Daily News:
All eyes the other night were on Robert Pattinson, who couldn’t keep his hands off his little trampire.
Stewart, however, was so noticeably self-conscious about the PDA that it became dinner theater.
“Maybe she’s just not that into you R-Pattz.” one onlooker joked to his table mates as they all marveled over Stewart’s evasiveness. The few diners there agreed that Stewart who famously cheated on her boyfriend of roughly four years last summer didn’t reciprocate.
“Move on!” said one spy, who suggested Pattinson should be more like Leonardo DiCaprio, who’s well known for loving and leaving lingerie models.
Joined by Sienna Miller, nightlife impresario Nur Khan and Lindsay Lohan’s BFF Gavin Doyle, the star crossed couple arrived separately to a dinner party at Graydon Carter’s Beatrice Inn.
R-Pattz popped in around 10 p.m. He was nursing a beer and chatting with pals when a casually dressed Stewart, who’d stopped off to change out of the A.L.C. leather dress she’d worn to a midtown screening of “On the Road,” arrived half an hour later.
Immediately, diners at a nearby table felt a chill in the air. “She just took his hand off her butt!” exclaimed one nearby diner as Stewart held Pattinson’s paw, seemingly to stop it from roaming. Later, Stewart sheepishly turned her head when he moved in for a smooch.
According to a spy, Stewart said: “Don’t kiss me.”
Despite their chemistry — or lack thereof — Stewart and Pattinson headed uptown to Khan’s club The Electric Room after finishing dinner around 1 a.m.
On Wednesday, Stewart appeared on “Today” to promote “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn — Part 2,” in which she stars with Pattinson.
When host Savannah Guthrie asked Stewart about their relationship, the elusive actress said: “I’m going to let people watch whatever little movie they think our lives are … keep ’em guessing, I always say.”
There have been several reports like this lately: Rob and Kristen are out together, he’ll try to be affectionate, and she won’t have any of it. That’s sad, isn’t it? It’s sad if this is a real relationship because he loves her but she obviously isn’t into it anymore, and it’s sad if it’s a staged relationship because he looks kind of like a loser. There’s just no winning in a relationship with Kristen Stewart, is there?
November 11, 2012 at 2:00 pm by Emily
It’s almost time, friends. It’s almost time for the end of the Twilight saga. Breaking Dawn, the second part, comes out this month, and after that, no more. It’s hard, isn’t it? SO hard.
Now, I don’t know if you’ve heard about this or not, but Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson, Taylor Lautner, and pretty much everyone that was ever involved in the movies has been talking about this big, secret ending for a while now. Apparently, they changed the ending. There was no word on if it was a small change, like if Edward changed his shirt or something, or if it was a big change, like Bella freaked out and killed everyone and then learned how to be invisible and also ate her baby (spoiler alert: that does not happen).
But in one of the many, many appearances that Kristen’s been doing lately, an interviewer took it upon himself to just go ahead and mention what exactly the new ending entails. And Kristen was hilariously not pleased.
Here’s the amusing, spoiler-filled clip:
I’m, surprisingly, Team Kristen all the way on this one. What a bitchy little interview. If you’re in the position to be interviewing Kristen Stewart about this movie, you should know that the ending is supposed to be a secret. And if you can actually get this awkward girl to joke around with you, then you don’t act like a bitch about it. And yeah, it’s not a major spoiler, but come on, guy. Just shut your bitchy face.
I have to say, though, the news about the new ending makes me even more excited to see the movie. Can you even imagine, that little walk down memory lane?
November 10, 2012 at 10:00 am by Emily
Yeah, because no. It’s really, really bad – I’d say it makes her look like she’s got a unibrow, which, sorry to all of the unibrowed people out there, is never a good look, but it’s too far down, so she looks like she’s got some kind of malformation of her forehead and eyebrows and eyelids. It’s like she was going for a Vulcan look, but the makeup artist heard “vulva” instead, and made a vagina out of black eye makeup atop the bridge of Kristen’s nose.
Anyway, this is what Kristen looked like for a recent ‘On the Road’ thing, and while I like her dress alright, and the fact that she’s standing next to that hot-hottie-hotterson, Garrett Hedlund, the eye makeup is just simply atrocious, and there’s really no reparations that can be made for such a thing.
Let’s just forget about Kristen Stewart for the day (way hard, I know) and start fresh tomorrow morning, can we do that?
November 9, 2012 at 7:30 am by Sarah
To be honest, I’ve never been involved in any of those situations [cheating], so I don’t know [if trust can be regained]. It would be just a guess and a shot in the dark, and I don’t want to give that if I haven’t even been there myself. [But] I absolutely think it’s possible [to fix the relationship]. It depends on how long you were with that person. If it was a long, serious relationship, I think it’s quite easy to rekindle. I guess it depends on what damage has been done. There’s no ex out there who I’m not friends with today, and I’m extremely thankful for that. Honesty and loyalty are key. If two people can be honest with each other about everything, that’s probably the biggest key to success. I like to think of myself as very loyal, and I love everyone I surround myself with, whether they’re friends or girlfriends or whatever. I love loyal people. [And] Kristen in fantastic at everything she does. I’m always proud of her.
So right. I’m not even all that interested in what he has to say about Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson, because come on. Clearly Taylor’s just trying to slice himself up a piece of the publicity pie that Kristen baked for Rupert Sanders’ teeny penis, and everyone’s really just interested in finding out whether or not Taylor Squared is banging again. I mean, you read that bit about being friendly with all exes, right? It’s happening, totally.
November 8, 2012 at 9:30 am by Sarah
Dude, no. I can’t wait to be a mom, but like, no. I can wait.
—Kristen Stewart‘s response when asked if she’s ready to have children of her own at a ‘Breaking Dawn: Part 2′ press junket. And I don’t even know what to say about this. Is this about new dogs? Or is this really about children? Does Kristen really want us to think that getting a second dog (child) is going to be a good thing? She breaking us in gently? Is this even grammatically correct? So many questions.
In any case, whatever. I’m not going to say that Kristen’s going to be some great-ass mom because she’s a mom in ‘Breaking Dawn: Part 2′ who does some noble, child-protecting things, because guys, it’s just a movie, and also, that’s called “delusion.” But hey. If she wants to go ahead and have, like, a million babies with Robert Pattinson, I’m OK with that, too, because I think, together, they can conquer the world, one schleppy director at a time.
November 7, 2012 at 6:30 am by Sarah
Oh Kristen Stewart. You know, no matter how many times you cheat on your long-term partner, and no matter how many times you think it’s OK to buy a dog (or have a kid) in order to repair the relationship that you nearly wrecked with your infidelity, one thing will never change—you will always, always be so breathtakingly beautiful, for sure.
Seriously. I love the dress, I love the shoes, I love the disheveled hair … There’s nothing I don’t love about this look. I even love the way her elbow crooks when she waves hello. But the most important thing about this picture is the fact that she actually looks pretty happy, and pretty relaxed. And while I don’t condone what she did behind darling Robert Pattinson‘s back, I think it’s time she forgave herself and moved on from a mistake that hopefully doesn’t hit the repeat button again.
Kristen’s look—love it or leave it?