Photo via TMZ
I love fashion. Not so much in a “check out this designer, isn’t he so similar to this designer?” way, more in a “this skirt is adorable, this fabric is awful, look at how horrible the construction is on this dress” way. I like to look at clothes, I like to make clothes, and on a different note, I absolutely adore talking smack. So understandably, whenever two celebrities (however loosely defined that term may be) wear the same dress, I get excited.
In an extremely fortunate series of events, Kim Kardashian wore this dress out to dinner and then Khloe thought it was super cute and snatched it up to go out on the town just a few days later. I’m calling this “extremely fortunate” because this is such a good example of the fact that not all dresses are flattering on all ladies. Kim is about to straight bust out of that dress while Khloe just looks kind of lumpy (and somewhat reminiscent of gruel). Maybe this dress is for no one, Kardashian sisters.
What do you guys think? Does this dress belong with Khloe or with Kim or, as I’d hope you’d answer, with neither? Please don’t let me down, dear readers.
September 28, 2010 at 11:28 am by Emily
Kim Kardashian got the ol’ feely feely from a TSA employee this morning at LAX. You know, I’ve been through that same security gate maybe ten times in the last four years and I’ve never been checked. Should I take it personally? Do you think that maybe Kim’s went to the next stage of the screening process because of her former BFF-ness with Paris Hilton A.K.A. I Travel With Cocaine In My Vagina Lady?
Regardless, you know that TSA chick was on her celly in the bathroom to her best friend within five minutes of Kim leaving security all, “Yo, girl! I just ran my wand over Kim Kardashian’s ass and stuck my hands in her shirt. Girl, it was so wild.”
September 26, 2010 at 11:58 am by Molls
I don’t watch that Kardashian show because I really prefer that my trashy reality television showcases alcoholic young adults with ridiculous nicknames or teenage mothers, so I tend not to tell you guys things about them unless it involves The Biebz or blow up dolls or something equally as great. And I think this might be a little more great.
An inmate in Pennsylvania has filed a lawsuit against Kim, Kourtney, and Khloe Kardashian, saying that their shows have caused him “extreme emotional distress.” Here’s the full story from TMZ:
According to a lawsuit filed in federal court, D.J. Goodson claims he was forced to watch “Keeping Up with the Kardashians” and “Kourtney and Khloe Take Miami.” Punishment for bad behavior, perhaps?
Goodson says he developed “extreme emotional distress due to their outrageousness of actions.”
Goodson claims he’s permanently scarred from watching domestic abuse (a boxing match on the show featuring Kim), emotional abuse (rantings courtesy of Kourtney and “paramour Scott”) and racism (Khloe referring to a baby doll as “the black baby”).
Goodson wants $75,000 in damages.
I wish I had the time and money to file lawsuits against celebrities for the emotional distress they’ve caused me. I’d go after JC Chasez for selling himself so short with his solo career that it damaged my fragile teenage psyche, and I’d probably see what I could do about the emotional assault I faced with the premature cancellation of Firefly.
Following the good example of D.J. Goodson, who would you guys sue?
September 18, 2010 at 2:31 pm by Emily
I have no idea why. The doll, Kinky Kim, is advertised as a “busty bubble-butt bimbo who’s had more dark meat inside her than a bucket of fried chicken.” And I will be damned if that’s not the most charming, appealing thing I’ve ever heard. What woman wouldn’t want to have a blow up doll modeled after her? What’s that? A good deal of woman wouldn’t want this? Whatever, prudes.
As it turns out, Kim falls into the category of women who would not appreciate this treatment, and she’s threatening to take the matter to court. Here’s the story from TMZ:
For some reason — Kardashian believes the doll is modeled after her — thus violating her right of publicity — and now her lawyer, Shawn Chapman Holley, is on the attack.
Holley fired off a strongly worded letter to Pipedream Products, Inc. — the company behind the sex doll — demanding they stop production ASAP before she opens up a big, fat can of lawsuit.
But Pipedream, unlike their products, doesn’t plan on just taking this lying down — telling us, “The similarity between the Kinky Kim doll and Ms. Kardashian is purely coincidental.”
Ok, all jokes aside, I totally understand why Kim Kardashian would be creeped out. The doll is obviously intended to represent her, its tagline is disgusting, and take a look at the packaging again – it’s not even a tiny bit classy, even for a blow up doll. But this brings up a whole mess of questions: would you be offended or kind of flattered if someone made a sex toy inspired by you? Does Kim have the right to deny Pipedream their sexy creative freedom? Does anyone actually use blow up dolls?
September 17, 2010 at 8:55 am by Emily
Oh Kim. How the fashion gods are not smiling upon you today. Not even a little bit; not even in jest.
Kim Kardashian was photographed earlier this morning in London at the BBC 1 radio station for a promotional interview.
First of all, while I normally think that Kim is well-dressed and lovely and what not, this skirt that could double for a men’s locker room towel? I fucking hate it. It’s horrible and ugly and all sorts of unflattering. It’s the wrong cut, exposes odd parts of her legs — oh, and is the wrong length, too. Also, the shoes? Didn’t she learn in finishing school that chunky shoes paired with a tight skirt is just criticism waiting to happen?
And I won’t even get started on the cropped, ill-tailored faux blazer paired with a satin (satin?!) exaggerated cowl-neck blouse. Tucked in.
No, no. This entire outfit it all sorts of wrong. Sorry, Kim.
September 14, 2010 at 6:44 am by Sarah
When a women used Twitter to tell the world that she was planning on getting plastic surgery to make her face and body look just like Kim Kardashian’s in an attempt to convince her husband not to leave her, Kim made sure to retweet it, along with a simple “NO.” She also had a couple of inspirational messages to pass along to the woman:
Pls dont. Ur husband should love u 4 who u are! Don’t try 2 b someone else. Im sure u are beautiful inside &out! Just as u are
Don’t change yourself for anybody but yourself…be happy with who u are! Someone will appreciate and adore u just as you are.
I have my doubts that the original Tweet was legitimate (it included an @KimKardashian, which kind of makes it look like some girl was just looking to get a little shout-out from a Kardashian), but even if it wasn’t, I’m sure there are already a couple ladies who have gotten some form of plastic surgery inspired by Kim Kardashian. I say good on her for giving that tried and true message of “no really, please just be yourself,” and hopefully at least one poor impressionable girl with a Twitter account will listen.