Got a Tip? Help us Beet Off!




Kelly Clarkson

3Kelly Clarkson Wants a Baby For Christmas

Barack Obama Sworn In As U.S. President For A Second Term

Kelly Clarkson and boyfriend Brandon Blackstock got engaged in December of last year, and while they’ve been too busy to actually get married and are just ~enjoying being engaged~, that hasn’t stopped Kelly from looking ahead to the future… which includes LOTS OF BABIES.

From Access Hollywood:

“We’re getting married soon – like really soon – and I already told him that when we’re past the wedding, I want a baby. I was like, ‘That’s my Christmas present that you can give me’.”

Oooh, so this story is a double hitter – we find out they’re getting married soon, too. Like, before the end of the year soon!

I hope she does get the baby she wants for Christmas because, well, babies can be cute (even though it really grosses me out to think of this guy “giving her a baby”, but that’s just semantics) and she wants one, so why not? Live it up! Maybe it’ll soften the blow of losing that Jane Austen ring.

Follow us on Twitter | Facebook

October 14, 2013 at 9:30 am by Jennifer
Filed Under: Kelly Clarkson

1In The Battle Of Kelly Clarkson VS Jane Austen, Jane Austen Won

 2013 CMA Music Festival

Over the summer, Kelly Clarkson won a bid for $228,000 for a ring belonging to Jane Austen. This did not please Britain, who wanted to keep the ring in Ms. Austen’s homeland. Ms. Clarkson was like, “Huh? No” or something and Britain was like, “We will find a way, Ms. Clarkson” and then resumed petting a long white fluffy cat on the head.

Well, they did find a way. Here’s the bragging, directly from Jane Austen(‘s House Museum website):

We are pleased to announce that our campaign to raise funds to purchase the gold and turquoise ring, once owned by Jane Austen, has been successful. Our offer to buy the ring from singer Kelly Clarkson has been accepted. …We would like to say a massive thank you to everyone who has donated to the appeal.

So really, it wasn’t Kelly Clarkson vs. Jane Austen but more like Kelly Clarkson vs. Britain or more like Kelly Clarkson vs. Jane Austen fanatics in Britain, but it’s more interesting to picture Clarkson and Austen duking it out.

I guess everyone’s happy!

Follow us on Twitter | Facebook

September 23, 2013 at 5:30 pm by Catherine St. Ives
Filed Under: Kelly Clarkson

7Kelly Clarkson Thinks Everyone at the VMAs Resembled “Pitchy Strippers”

kelly clarkson

Kelly Clarkson was probably too busy to attend the MTV Video Music Awards in Brooklyn on Sunday night, but she did make time to catch it on TV, and she wasn’t too pleased with what she saw. Between Lady GaGa‘s coke-fuelled mess of a “performance” to Miley Cyrus‘s exercise in cultural appropriation and pedophilia roleplay, the whole thing didn’t go over too well with the ‘Mr. Know-It-All’ singer.

Of course, you can’t shit these days without having someone share it on Twitter, so that’s where Kelly headed to share her thoughts about the state of the event:


When pressed by a fan to be nice, she replied:


Alright, listen. Pitchy? Totally into it. The vocals were all the fuck over the place and it was not a nice sonic experience. Cultural appropriation? Miley’s got you covered. Poor taste? Sure. But calling someone a “stripper” is implying that there’s something wrong with strippers and y’all know I’m not into slut shaming, whatever your personal feelings on sex/sexuality/public expression if it may be. Tone it down, Clarkson.

Of course, it wasn’t long before one of Miley’s “Smilers” – or rather, grown ass men who work in “the industry” and clearly will take a view of tits and ass however they can get it – jumped in to defend her and call Kelly names because she’s a big fat fatty (eyeroll):


Everyone just cool it. It’s not that serious.

August 27, 2013 at 6:30 am by Jennifer

0Kelly Clarkson’s Releasing a Christmas Album

kelly clarkson christmas album

Hang on to your hats, because I fucking love Christmas. Seriously, I start doing a countdown on, like, September 1. I love Christmas music and Christmas decorations and all the Christmas programs on TV and AHHHHH CHRISTMAS IS SO GOOD, GUYS. That’s why I’m glad Kelly Clarkson is putting out a Christmas album. I won’t buy it or even listen to it, probably, but the fact that it exists? I respect that. (I need to watch Zoolander.)

Here’s her tweets:


It’s called Wrapped in Red and is out October 29, in case you were wondering.

August 20, 2013 at 2:30 pm by Jennifer
Filed Under: Kelly Clarkson

0Britain Really Doesn’t Want Kelly Clarkson Getting That Jane Austen Ring

kelly clarkson

Kelly Clarkson paid roughly $228,000 for a ring formerly belonging to Jane Austen and then Britain basically forbid her from taking it out of the country on cultural grounds and in hopes that someone else (read: someone British) to pledge the same amount and cancel her bid out. Now, an anonymous donor has come forward and bid £100,000 (about $78,000 short of Kelly’s buying price) to keep it in the country and she might lose it for good. What? Ugh.

From Digital Spy:

Culture minister Ed Vaizey placed a temporary hold on the item, which will keep it on British soil until September 30. This can be extended to December 30 if a new buyer comes forward and intends to match Clarkson’s winning bid.

The government is said to be satisfied that the Hampshire-based Jane Austen’s House Museum has shown “serious expression of interest to buy the ring” after receiving the £100,000 donation.

It now has until the December date to raise £52,450 and ensure the ring stays in the UK.

The museum tried to win the 19th century item at the original auction but was outbid by Clarkson.

Vaizey said: “Jane Austen’s modest lifestyle and her early death mean that objects associated with her of any kind are extremely rare.

“So I hope that a UK buyer comes forward so this simple but elegant ring can be saved for the nation.”

Again, why the hell not put a stipulation on the initial auction saying that it’s only open to UK buyers? Why the hell does it even matter? These seem like pretty extreme lengths to go to for a single ring – especially considering there are much more important artifacts on the go.

August 14, 2013 at 11:30 am by Jennifer
Filed Under: Kelly Clarkson

4Why Are British Government Officials PISSED With Kelly Clarkson?

kelly clarkson CMA 2013

Kelly Clarkson angered a nation, or at least the batshit crazy Jane Austen fans part of it — when she had the audacity to buy a piece of Austen’s jewelry at an auction. Wow, what a bitch!!!! Ms. Clarkson won the ring for a staggering $228,000. But now British officials want the piece to stay in their country.

From Digital Spy:

Culture minister Ed Vaizey has placed a temporary hold on the item which will keep it on British soil until September 30. This can be extended to December 30 if a new buyer comes forward and intends to match Clarkson’s winning bid.

Vaizey told BBC News: “Jane Austen’s modest lifestyle and her early death mean that objects associated with her of any kind are extremely rare.

“So I hope that a UK buyer comes forward so this simple but elegant ring can be saved for the nation.”

If the ring fails to find a new buyer, Clarkson will be granted an export licence and have it flown out of the UK.

Then WHY was it even up for auction? And dude, I think the UK will somehow survive without Jane Austen’s ring.

Good luck, Kelly! Too bad this “culture minister” doesn’t love you as much as the producers of American Idol.

August 2, 2013 at 3:30 pm by Catherine St. Ives
Filed Under: Kelly Clarkson
  • Page 3 of 12
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 12