Oh Vanity Fair. Something about this is just wrong, and I can’t quite put my finger on WHAT. Seeing Gwyneth Paltrow like this is similar to seeing your sort-of-hot but really really god-awful boss naked. You derive no pleasure from it other than the grim satisfaction of knowing that she’s got actual skin instead of scales and horns, know what I mean, jellybean?
Hot.
I’m no fan, but here she certainly looks like one hot alien.
She looks like a giraffe.
Looks great……but there are even better pics of her totally in the buff, poolside, back in her Brad Pitt days
Sorry, there is never ever anything bad about pictures of hot naked, or almost naked women, no matter how much you might dislike them. Like and lust are two entirely different emotions.
She’s a pale ugly america hating leftist—go away!
Know how I know you’re gay?
Scorching hot!
What cup size is she , triple A? Theres girls in grammar school with bigger tits than she has, so who cares?
It’s quite artistic, but she should do away with the fishnets!
Why? Seriously, why? Blech.
All you haters CHILL! She is one luscious babe! Look at that tiny waist and cute ass! I don’t know anything about her politics -and I don’t care! I’d do her in a heartbeat!
One thing’s for sure: This publicity stunt/movie promo of hers is far more appealing than said movie.
I think she’s gorgeous. Paltrow has a very unique sort of beauty.
Sometimes people can be very hateful and rude in their opinions, no matter how grown up they are, but they are still allowed to have an opinion. The very logical argument though is: if you don’t like the photo why comment? Move on.