Comments on: Evan Rachel Wood Is Not Happy With the Paparazzi

By: meh1

meh1 — Sat, 16 Feb 2013 01:31:53 +0000

she’s right but i’m really having trouble feeling sympathy because i find her so incredibly irritating

By: M

Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:40:47 +0000

Goddamn, Evan. You want some french cries with that wahmburger? Put it in your handbag. Problem solved. Sometimes I feel like they just bitch to bitch.

By: mireee

mireee — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:26:14 +0000

She’s completely right, it’s awful. It’s a child. Plus, in some countries there are laws to protect children of celebrities: Spain, for example, blurs the faces of all the children whose parents haven’t given permission to be photographed, so candids are always blurred. Spanish celebrities’ children are anonymous.

By: Pique

Pique — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:48:33 +0000

It’s one thing to parade your kid around for everyone to see, it’s another to take a picture of a sonogram and publish it. I’m team Evan on this.

By: Nobody

Nobody — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:01:36 +0000

Jamie Bell & Evan Rachel Wood are married.

By: Cindy

Cindy — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:54:12 +0000

I’m glad you raised this issue as I’ve wondered before how much I’m supporting that invasive culture by visiting sites like this? I hear your point about supply and demand, but doesn’t that make you and I a part of the problem?

By: archphoenix

archphoenix — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:08:31 +0000

I agree with Rachel and Anonymous here – while paparazzi suck, it’s kind of a part of being “famous” I guess. But taking a photo of your ultrasound while at a hospital? That’s crossing a line. Snaps of a girl at the grocery store, ok; at the doctor’s office and posting the ultrasound? Nuh uh.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 22:45:46 +0000

I think it was way more to do with the fact they took photos and posted it of her actual scan. Her child isn’t born yet they are invading its privacy. And I tend to agree that was a violation too far