Today's Evil Beet Gossip

Here’s A Picture of Kelsey Grammer’s Baby at The Playboy Mansion

A photo of Kelsey Grammer's baby

Yep, there she is. Kelsey Grammer‘s little bitty three-month-old daughter, partying it up for Halloween at the Playboy Mansion. But, as you can see, it’s not nearly as bad as we thought it was, because yeah, she’s a little bitty baby at a party at the Playboy Mansion, and yeah, the music is loud or whatever, but you can tell the baby is having an awesome time. And also, she’s being watched by some random girl who looks totally responsible. Where’s the problem?

And for all of you who still think that this is bad parenting, Kelsey Grammer himself issued a statement to TMZ, explaining the whole thing:

“Kayte is breast-feeding and we do not have a nanny or a trusted baby-sitter at this time, so Faith goes everywhere with us. The baby slept as her ears were covered the entire time and we left shortly after midnight. We love our child. Kayte is my wife and lady love (who is 31 and goes by the name Kayte Grammer, by the way, not Walsh). The world is round. All our eyes are blue. Happy Halloween and Cock-a-doodle-doo!”

We were all worrying for nothing! She’s breast-feeding, all right! And the baby’s ears were covered by that blanket, as you can clearly see in the picture, and the left before 1:00 AM. And all our eyes are blue. Cock-a-doodle-doo, motherf-ckers.

Image courtesy of TMZ

10 CommentsLeave a comment

  • Jeez, why give up going to a loud, all night party just because you have an infant who needs to be with you all of the time? Parenthood should not have any effect on how you live your life. Get your priorities straight. Parties are way more important than the comfort and wellbeing of your infant.

  • Why do they need a babysitter when the kids got a mother who should be at home. Child protective services needs to be called. This old ass man should know better.

  • Man, oh, man. This guy and his wife are not simply selfish and ignorant, they are also arrogant (and . While I don’t find their act as heinous as, say, cooking the baby in the microwave or starving it to death, like many other psychopaths unfortunately happen to do, I think that bringing the baby to a loud late party is disconcertingly irresponsible and inadequate. I can understand why people haul their children along at restaurants and stores (although I don’t do it myself – very soon my baby gets fed up with the various noises and people and bright lights and starts whimpering, and I do not wish to cause him unnecessary distress, or to annoy the others like I myself was many times annoyed by random screaming kids out and about – so I like to do my shopping alone and I enjoy a peaceful adult evening out with friends). But there are places where you just don’t take your children. For instance – 4 year olds at an Adventures screening (the trailer for Prometheus itself was enough to freak me out, let alone a toddler). 12 year-olds at a bar. 3 month-olds at the Playboy Mansion. It’s that simple.

    But then again, many of these celebrities have a very vague sense of normality and morals.

    Which is not an excuse. The fuckers must be reprimanded. Fuckers.

  • Has Kelsey and his new wife not heard of a breast pump? So all that money flowing in from “Boss” and Kelsey and his new wife don’t own a breast pump?

  • It’s called the wife stays home with the baby so she can breastfeed if it’s that important to them (or use a breast pump and they can both go) and Dad gets to go by himself. Priorities people!

  • I watched a clip of him with Oprah and I truly felt even more sorry for Camille and her children. What an asshat. And just when I thought he could not be a more vile person, this lovely story comes out. And his wife is just as vile. Clearly, these people only think of themselves. I cant even watch Simpson’s reruns when Side Show Bob is on the episode!

  • iDied @ cuckadoodledoo….
    well…. on a serious note i cant see why, even if they absolutely HAD to go to that party and HAD to take the baby (rolls eyes), why they couldnt put the infant in an entirely different room. Why did the baby have to be in the same room where the party was being held?
    If this was black folks, they’d be ghetto…so im going to go ahead and call this trash.

  • iDied @ cuckadoodledoo….
    well…. on a serious note i cant see why, even if they absolutely HAD to go to that party and HAD to take the baby (rolls eyes), why they couldnt put the infant in an entirely different room. Why did the baby have to be in the same room where the party was being held?
    If this was black folks, they’d be labelled ‘ghetto’…so im going to go ahead and call this ‘trash’. SMH. This cannot be life.

  • Couldnt find someone they trust? o’really? but they trust all that smoking, drinking and dope using around their infant? BTW flake-head, there is this wonderful age-old phenomenon called expressing breastmilk so that its available for the baby when the mother cant physically be there.
    This is such a fail situation on so many levels.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.