Comments on: Kristen Stewart Did Not Sleep With Rupert Sanders

By: Satan

Satan — Sat, 29 Sep 2012 05:46:21 +0000

I would NOT take my partner back for any sort of cheating, especially KISSING. That is just freakin’ rude!

By: Taeko

Taeko — Sat, 29 Sep 2012 02:46:36 +0000

If it were a publicity stunt, why wouldn’t they have just gone down the marriage/baby rumors route? Seems a lot easier/safe/more likely to get twihards wet than a cheating scandal.

By: mireee

mireee — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:12:14 +0000

I think cheating is what you wouldn’t feel comfortable telling your partner. So, for some people it would be a kiss and for some other people it would be sex. I know if it was like a drunk snog at the club I may be okay, but if it were like this, were they were sneaking off and it went on for several weeks, I don’t think I’d take my partner back.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:06:12 +0000

Actually, you people are really dumb if you think that two people who were sneaking off to cheat just made out. What adult would do that? They both made the conscious decision to lie to their BF/wife and sneak off with the other. If you can’t close the deal after that point why even bother. Even a junior high kid would walk away afterward asking his buddies to sniff his finger. One more thing… making sex is like Chinese dinner… it ain’t over until you both get your cookies.

By: Pique

Pique — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:48:43 +0000

Looking at the fan base a publicity stunt is very possible – they’re all 10-16 years old with some fanatic (creepy) 17+ people there, and they live for drama. To give a counter example, there was Rihanna & Chris Brown who created a similar drama, it was in the news for a gazillion years, and now it seems that most have forgiven and many are even making excuses for the scumbag. They needed to fill the papers, they needed everyone to give an opinion, and now that they’ve ‘fixed’ it they’ll make increased sales. I’m still not convinced that Kristen and Robert ever were a genuine couple.

By: luke

luke — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:20:26 +0000

Wow, you people really are dumb if you believe that was a publicity stunt. Rob has no balls if he really took that ho back. A cheater WILL cheat again. He’ll get crushed again when she screws someone else, and every guy will just laugh at him because he should of known better. He must be attracted to the nasty greasy haired girls, ewwww

By: Emily

Emily — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:52:32 +0000

It’s weird though, the publicity stunt thing. The timing is really suspicious, and it’s definitely getting a whole, whole lot of buzz, and people will be paying even more attention to the premiere for sure, but I don’t understand why they’d take the risk. Kristen could have even more popularity than she did, enough to ruin her career. And why would Rupert Sanders get involved in the first place? He just directed his first movie, and now everyone things he’s this gross creepy perv, and I don’t understand why he would get his family involved.

By: jus sayin

jus sayin — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:12:31 +0000

Cheating is cheating, period. And once a lying, cheating whore always a lying cheating whore… jus sayin

By: Pique

Pique — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:07:21 +0000

Yep yep, if this wasn’t a publicity stunt I’d be deeply surprised.

By: Elizabeth

Elizabeth — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:02:18 +0000

I agree. I think they’re just doing it because of the movie they have to promote. So that it’s not awkward and they can juice every last bit out of this last movie. And yes cheating is the act of betrayal, no matter on what level.

By: a

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:50:04 +0000

why dont you just install adblock plus if you have firefox. chrome might have it as well not sure. eliminates ads everywhere

By: marshmella

marshmella — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:16:26 +0000

When I have to close down three different advertisements to be able to view this site, make that four if I want to comment, I am done with the site. Adios! I was a long time reader, but you ruined it with your greed for the advertiser’s bucks.