Today's Evil Beet Gossip

Nadya Suleman Did An Interview, Kind of Scares Me With Her Scary, Scary Voice


I mean, she’s got kind of a scary voice, right? Let’s call a duck a duck and not mince words. She sounds like a mass murderer who’s been locked up and on major doses of Thorazine.

The above clip is an exclusive interview with the Octomom, Nadya Suleman, courtesy of our friends at Celebuzz. Nadya spoke out about her recent “nude” photo shoot, which was done in order to pay rent for her and her bajillion kids.

In the second video, right here, she talks about plastic surgery and how she, you know, didn’t have it:

My favorite part of the interview was probably when Nadya started talking about her bellybutton. BECAUSE SHE BLAMED ITS VOLDEMORT-LIKE APPEARANCE ON A BELLYBUTTON RING. Girl, please. I’ve had two kids and I had a bellybutton ring back in the day, too. I know you’ve had, like, seven times more children than I’ll ever even consider, so things might look a little different in comparison, but come on. Don’t do Voldemort dirty, girl. Be at peace with your inner demonic warlock, OK?

And her value is definitely starting to decline. Sources at TMZ claim that no one really wants Nadya nudes any longer, and she’s definitely way past her prime:

In case you didn’t know, Vivid honcho Steve Hirsch offered Nadya Suleman $1 MILLION in 2009 to star in her own skin flick — but Octo turned him down.

Hirsch made a second offer in 2010 to help bail her out of foreclosure — $500,000 for ONE hardcore scene — but Octo rejected that too.

Now, in the wake of Nadya’s topless photo shoot, Hirsch is making one final push to lock the mother of 14 into a porn contract — except this time … he’s not offering 7 figures … OR half a million … not even close.

Hirsch sent Octo a letter yesterday, offering her a paltry $100,000 to appear in THREE hardcore sex scenes — claiming, “Regrettably your market value has diminished.”

Oh dear. Wouldn’t you just be kicking yourself so hard right now if you were the Octomom? Or, you know, always?

3 CommentsLeave a comment