Feature

- Adrien Brody. Shirtless. Cannes.

- Baby's Sex Revealed: Snooki's Having a ...

- CAPTION THIS and Win Stuff from Evil Beet!

- Guess the Celebrity Nails!

- Celebrities Without Makeup: Guess Who?

- Check Out Ryan Gosling's 'Gangster Squad' Trailer

- Who's Hotter: Courtney Stodden or Mom?

- Rihanna v. Chris Brown: A Brand-New Feud

- More Accusers Come Forward Against John Travolta

- Johnny Depp: "I am not single."

- 5 Best Dressed at the 2012 Met Gala

- Win Amazon Gift Cards!

- Everyone *Finally* Hates Kim Kardashian

- PHOTOS: Lindsay Lohan's 'Glee' Stills

- Guess the Ill-Dressed Celebrity!
Dec 19, 2011 at 10:30 am by Sarah

Pam Anderson, circa 2011. In all honesty, she doesn’t look all that different (from the, uh, neck down) than the Pam Anderson of the late eighties/early nineties. And think back, she was one of the hottest things going in those days. She could’ve bedded any dude she wanted. And probably did. Which is why, yes, based on her appearance I’d probably still hit it, but based on the fact that she’s more than likely stretched out to hell and back, I’m more apt to say “I’ll pass on that.”

Would you or wouldn’t you?









































































































no, i would not still hit it. but i’m in the very small minority that was never particularly enamored of her to begin with. overrated from day one.
She’s got a great bod, but she’s definitely a butter face.
Why does this look so photoshopped?!
Man yes I will even if she was 90 I will still hit and quit it..Los Skandelouz Ca