Feature

- Adrien Brody. Shirtless. Cannes.

- Baby's Sex Revealed: Snooki's Having a ...

- CAPTION THIS and Win Stuff from Evil Beet!

- Guess the Celebrity Nails!

- Celebrities Without Makeup: Guess Who?

- Check Out Ryan Gosling's 'Gangster Squad' Trailer

- Who's Hotter: Courtney Stodden or Mom?

- Rihanna v. Chris Brown: A Brand-New Feud

- More Accusers Come Forward Against John Travolta

- Johnny Depp: "I am not single."

- 5 Best Dressed at the 2012 Met Gala

- Win Amazon Gift Cards!

- Everyone *Finally* Hates Kim Kardashian

- PHOTOS: Lindsay Lohan's 'Glee' Stills

- Guess the Ill-Dressed Celebrity!
Dec 17, 2011 at 09:00 am by Emily














































































































They don’t care WHY we are interested (“trainwreck” vs. “can produce somethingof value”). They just care THAT we are interested. The money’s the same. If you want her to go away, look away people, look away.
I don’t get it either. I mean, she doesn’t have a good image, people don’t like her. I don’t see why they keep on giving her modelling jobs.
Photoshop FTW
She’s a good model… she’s broken and I actually still feel very sorry for her… but she is in fact a good model. I don’t like her looks for that matter but most of the time her pictures have something to them… also she arouses attention – isn’t that all what advertising is about?
And while we’re on it… she’d still be a fabulous actress, too. I count on you, Mr. Tarantino.
Aren’t the culture vultures just waiting for her to OD? Then whichever mag/rag had the ‘last’ photo shoot will publish the photos and everyone will look deep into her dead eyes to try to read whether or not her look foretold her impending death? isn’t that how the Hollywood ending happens for someone like her? too dark? Not by half, I think.
@Momster: That is exactly what I was thinking.
hahha love ya Emily :D