Feature

- Adrien Brody. Shirtless. Cannes.

- Baby's Sex Revealed: Snooki's Having a ...

- CAPTION THIS and Win Stuff from Evil Beet!

- Guess the Celebrity Nails!

- Celebrities Without Makeup: Guess Who?

- Check Out Ryan Gosling's 'Gangster Squad' Trailer

- Who's Hotter: Courtney Stodden or Mom?

- Rihanna v. Chris Brown: A Brand-New Feud

- More Accusers Come Forward Against John Travolta

- Johnny Depp: "I am not single."

- 5 Best Dressed at the 2012 Met Gala

- Win Amazon Gift Cards!

- Everyone *Finally* Hates Kim Kardashian

- PHOTOS: Lindsay Lohan's 'Glee' Stills

- Guess the Ill-Dressed Celebrity!
Sep 22, 2011 at 12:54 pm by Sarah


















































































































Two things I find distressing about these pictures – A) I think McAdams seems like a nice girl, but she was the WORST thing about the first Sherlock Holmes. B) Creepy Asian Stereotypes as disguises. What do you call that? Yellowface?
I don’t think much of Rachel McAdams. I’d disagree that she’s a nice person. I find her to be dull, stupid, shallow, and self-centered. This is not unlike a lot of the actor/actress crowd.
Here are a couple of quotes to get you started:
“I wanted to be a secretary, I love paper clips and staplers.”
“If I hurt someone, if I were to accidentally poke someone’s eye out, I would laugh. And then I’d say, ‘I’m sorry, I really do feel bad,’ but then I’m on the floor rolling.”
“You never really know the person you’re sleeping beside. You have a right to your secrets, but that’s very difficult when you’re supposed to be someone’s partner.”
I could go on. I mean, she doesn’t own a car. She doesn’t do relationships, she does “relations” i.e. have sex until she’s tired of someone.
She’s been with Gosling, if that tells you anything. And she’s preposterously over-hyped.
Oh, and I think I’ll go with the fact she was the worst thing (aside from butchering Sir Arthur Conan Doyle) , I mean, Rachel isn’t fit to polish Irene Adler’s silverware. Admittedly, Adler is a fictional person but probably has more depth.
Yeah, I don’t guess I care for her much. The works are much better anyway; I learned to separate “book works” and “movie works” a loooooong time ago.
The movies definitely don’t touch the books, I agree.