Today's Evil Beet Gossip

Sold!

Debbie Rowe

Debbie Rowe has decided not to pursue custody for the two biological children that she carried for Michael Jackson.  I say “decided not to pursue” which in the case of Debbie Rowe, will always mean “received a really large financial settlement.”

In an agreement drawn up between the Jackson family lawyer and Debbie’s lawyer, Rowe will receive a payment of approximately $4M in exchange for terminating her parental rights once and for all.  Thankfully, there is a clause that prohibits her from shaking down the next guardian-in-waiting if Katherine Jackson were to die.  I guess you could say this is an “All Sales Final” deal.

Let’s see, this makes the third time Debbie Rowe has sold these children.  When she gave birth to them, she received $8M and $900,000 a year for five years.  Then when the sexual abuse allegations surfaced, she brokered a deal for another $4M and a house worth almost a million bucks.  My basic math skills tell me that these kids have been sold for almost $22M at this point.  I find this so sad. 

Meanwhile, Joe Jackson wants a Jackson 3 (Michael’s three children) group to be formed, the other Jackson brothers that were to be a part of a new reality show are upping their demands from $200,000 for the pilot up to $10-20 million, and Michael’s body has been removed from its temporary resting place at Forest Lawn to undergo more testing.  These.  Poor.  Children.

22 CommentsLeave a comment

  • Reading about these people makes me feel so much better about my f’d up family. Thank you.

  • Im not sure who’s the “bad” one here
    i dont like joe Jackson for sure
    but between debbie and katherine… I cant make up my mind
    you’re right!
    poor kids!

  • I read elsewhere Janet wants the kids and that the family thinks that’s a great idea because Katherine is getting on 80.

      • If he would have wanted her to take them, he would have mentioned this in his testament, wouldn’t he?

      • Yeah, he was such a great decision maker that he decided to leave them with a woman who’s in her 80’s… Good call, Michael.

  • oh dear..how sickening! Isnt this illegal? it should be. How does anyone justify termination of parental rights for $$$$? Janet plz rescue them!

  • Only wise jackson in the group is buy they out and show how lousey they are? Did she get a check yet? Um,.. are they really her children or just eggs busted from the rented nest. Michael left a lot of x’plainin to do.. so much for loving, diligent, concerned father award.

  • The thing that upsets me most is that even though Katherine Jackson has custody of the children and seems to care for them- she’s not actually doing anything to protect them. Especially from that man she calls her husband.

    It’s the same thing with Michael- every time you read about his childhood, they say his mother loved him and vice versa and that his father did whatever. But there’s never anything about what Katherine did while Michael and the rest of her children were being tormented into performing well by their father.

    At this point, I don’t really care what happens as long as Joe Jackson isn’t anywhere near those beautiful, poor babies.

    • you’re so right!
      Katherine may be a beautiful person, but she didn’t protect michael at the time, and I have my doubts that she would this time!

      Latoya is crackers, I hope for Janet too!

  • Someone needs to step in and get those kids away from all these crazy people. SO much greed!! They pretty much have no chance of turning out normal, happy, and well balanced now. NONE!

  • I’d believe this blog entry if the facts were attributed to someone. Why no attribution, Wendie? Those are quite a lot of BIG claims.

  • Her lawyer released a statment to CNN that she hasn’t given up her custody rights.

    Just say no to senstationalism of any kind. Claims like these should be attributed.

  • Debbies Lawyer just issued a statement to the New York Post, demanding a retraction for that story. He said it is a total lie! She did not make any deal regarding the children and 4million$.

  • Regardless of this mess, it blows my mind that Michael Jackson would leave his children to his mother, knowing full well that would be the same as giving them to his father. If I had been abused as he claimed he was by his father, I would have had enough common fucking sense not to do what he did.

  • this woman should be ashamed of herself. i hope she wil be banned from comin close to this kids forever.

  • i don’t know, i am still hoping that debbie rowe is actually motivated by keeping those kids the hell away from joe jackson. when i read the story about the “jackson 3” on msn i thought i was going to vomit. does he have no decency at all???? the whole family has to know that is what he would have least wanted for those kids. i would be team janet if i were sure she’d keep her father away from them and shelter them from the world a little bit.

  • these poor kids are royally screwed. but at the same time, they will be financially taken care of for the rest of their lives. we really don’t know what kind of gaurdian Katherine is, but she has had 9 children and a plethora of grandchildren. so hopefully the kids will be ok. i don’t think joe is really gonna make a “jackson 3” he would be a fool to try to do that. honestly debbie is just greedy white trash.

  • Those kids better have been good lays for 22 million.

    (yes, the comment is sick but so are the idiots that support this dead criminal because he was a song and dance man).

    • They weren’t “good lays,” Michael never had sex with Debbie. Not ever! And the third was born via a surrogate, so again, no nookie.

      I doubt Janet will get the children, since she has never had kids of her own. I do wonder why none of the other Jackson siblings are stepping up to take the kids? No one wants Joe to have them, and both he and Katherine are one foot in the grave. But if the other Jackson sibs are getting ready to star in a reality show, it would be a bad idea for the kids to go to them either.

      Ugh. Everybody loses.