Apr 03, 2009 at 02:03 pm by Evil Beet

paris hilton 030409

Paris Hilton sports some fancy duds for a photo shoot in LA.

Apr 03, 2009 at 01:17 pm by Evil Beet

Bridget Moynahan and her baby son John Edward Pictures Photos

Bridget Moynahan has been verrrrrry quiet in recent years, as Gisele Bundchen parades about the world carrying her child and giving stupid quotes to magazines about how she considers the child her own. Props to Bridget for that. However, she’s not above letting her “friends” “leak” some quotes about all this nonsense.

A source close to the 37-year-old model-actress [says], “Bridget has her own life, she doesn’t need to be involved in the drama of all this, and she finds it disrespectful that her son is being paraded around in front of the paparazzi when she’s specifically made it a point of keeping him away from that.”

The source went on to say pointedly, “I can count on two hands, in two years, the number of times Bridget has been photographed with that baby. I can count on two hands the number of times in the past month that Gisele has been photographed with that baby.”

In an even more personal attack, the source said, “If Tom is such a great father as everyone likes to say, then you would think that he’d respect the privacy of his young child and would ask his wife not to use his son as a publicity prop and a subject of public discussion.”

Damn! But it’s true. I personally am a little nauseated when I see Gisele toting around that little boy for the cameras. I’m glad that she’s bonding with him — obviously a child deserves as much love as he can get — but in front of the cameras, and the way she talks about him in interviews, is really, really annoying. I can’t even imagine how mad it makes Bridget. Kick her ass, Bridget!!!

Apr 03, 2009 at 01:10 pm by Evil Beet

55905062

Apparently, this recession is impacting everyone except the very, very, very, disgustingly rich. You know, the people who buy the clothes in Mary-Kate and Ashley’s fashion line, Elizabeth and James. The line is priced slightly below their other line, The Row — which features lambskin pants for $1700 — but it’s still not cheap, with prices ranging from $95 for a one-shoulder cotton tank to $775 for a leather jacket. Flirty dresses and fashion-forward slacks fall within the $225 to $475 range, while a fur coat runs a wee bit more. (A wee bit more? You mean like the life of an animal? Yes.)

“We try to keep everything under $1,000,” said a rep for the brand.

Well. THANK YOU. That’s refreshing. I’ve been SO TIRED for paying $1100 for a pair of pants. I can barely afford the $57 I’ve been paying for a stick of gum or the $275 for a box of tampons. Clothes for under $1000 is a nice change of pace.

On the success of Elizabeth and James, the Olsens are branching out into footwear with the help of Steve Madden and will launch a menswear collection in the fall.

Apr 03, 2009 at 11:59 am by Evil Beet

podcast_pic

Okay, it’s really not starring me. It’s starring the fabulous Film.com team of Laremy, Natalie and Garrett. But this week I had the awesome opportunity to sit in the studio with these talented folks and be the special guest on their weekly podcast. I had sooooo much fun!!!

We talked about making it in the blogging industry, my undying love for Beverly Hills Chihuahua and Georgia Rule, mean Internet commenters, our Southern belle Natalie, and much much more! So if you’re trying to figure out what to do with the remainder of your Friday afternoon at work, you DEFINITELY need to tune in!!!

Check it out here!!!

(If that link doesn’t work, you can listen to it here.)

Update: Laremy would like me to remind you that there are two segments with me during this podcast. The first is toward the start and lasts about seven minutes, and the second is at the end and lasts about 20 minutes. So make sure you catch both of ‘em!

Apr 03, 2009 at 10:21 am by Evil Beet

I can’t remember the last time I sat and laughed my ass off at a TRAILER. I can’t wait to see this movie. It looks pee-yourself funny.

Here’s the best part: They’re actually making you enter your age to view the trailer. That’s how offensive they think it is. (It’s really not all that offensive. The MPAA is just totally prudish.)

Apr 03, 2009 at 10:16 am by Wendie

audrinapatridgetaffeta-1

Audrina Patridge looking like a taffeta Tootsie Roll in Las Vegas.  While we are at loving it or leaving it, any guesses on what the tensile strength is of that material?