Today's Evil Beet Gossip

The Battle of the Legs

Gwyneth Paltrow’s been showing off her hot legs at the Iron Man premieres, and Cameron Diaz is not going to be outdone.

Here’s Cameron — long famous for her killer stems — at the What Happens In Vegas premiere in Westwood.

So … who’s got the better legs?

47 CommentsLeave a comment

  • hmm… well I think overall Gwynnie has the better shape… but Cameron looks better for having a bit of colour.

    Gwyneth dear, it’s called sunlight – look into it sometime.

  • I must say, Cameron Diaz wins for better legs and skin tone. Her shape seems more, natural? Unlike Gwyneth Paltrow, her legs seem to be of plastic like, and her body form is just…disoriented and weird, as with her color. Just my two cents, but both two pretty girls. :]

  • cammm defs
    they just look nicer
    but just coz gwens naturally pale, like myself, doesnt mean shes less sexy

  • Gwyneth’s legs look a bit more muscular and toned. I think her pale, almost milky white color can be kind of sexy as compaired to the almost compulsory, sprayed on, Hollywood tan. From a strictly male point of view ( or maybe, not), I would prefer to have my face between Gwyneth’s bare thights more than Cameron’s.

  • lay off of gwen guys, some of us like the naturally pale skin and think tans are disgusting. hello skin cancer! and fake tans are equally as gross.

    they both have nice legs though. I don’t know, I still think there’s something odd about gwen’s knees.

    also, these ladies are almost to the age where they shouldn’t be wearing that short of a dress, no matter how hot their legs look. well, cam is fine, but gwen, you’re 35!

  • I like the shapely toned look of Gwen’s legs. It looks like if she didn’t work out as much though they would just be skinny. Cameron on the other hand seems to have a healthy athletic build – her legs will probably always be great. And I also agree that tans are overated. I can’t decide. All I know is that I’d take either pair of legs and switch them with mine if I could!! LOL

  • I think Cameron’s legs are much better because they are naturally athletic. Gwen’s are good but she has to work at them.

    As a pale person, I can’t bitch about the colour.

  • Gwyneth has children! You gotta give the woman some props for that and i wouldn’t mind seeing more of cameron’s thighs;)

  • Gwen wins. You can tell she earned her legs with exercise. She has just the right amount of muscle definition.

    Cameron just has skinny legs. Even in heels she has almost no calf.

  • cameron b/c she’s tan and a bit more slender. gwens got good muscle, but i hope she doesn’t get too large. cameron’s are long and sleek.

  • Cameron’s legs are kickin’! She could live in a jungle- rowwwwwwwwwwrrrrrrrr!

    • Anyone can live in a jungle. Would she be the friendly leader of the tribe or would she down the other members and show no mercy?

    • If Cameron did live in a jungle would she be like Rambo (making traps to capture her food) or King Kong (being the giant of the land)?

      How would she cope with others in the same jungle?

  • Cam all the way. Gwen’s trying way too hard with the short dress. Really hon, the whole world is not your gynecologist….
    Cam has a much prettier leg shape.

  • Gwyneth has the best shape. Most definition around the knee, sweep to the quad and fullness in the calf. If Cam’s legs were as pale as Gwyneth’s we wouldn’t even be asking this question in the first place. No contest!

  • What if the two of them featured in a movie togeter and in the premiere, they try and out-leg each other. Also in the movie they were 60 foot tall smashing skyscrapers with their hot legs and pumps, who’s legs would be the better killers?

  • How has Cameron Diaz got “killler stems”? She hasn’t actually killed anyone with them.

    She is afterall a human being not a 50 foot giant rampaging in a “small in her view” city .

  • Definetly Gwen for me! I like more manly musculed/toned, but slender legs. Gwen’s legs show that she’s worked for that shape. cameron’s on the other side, look like she hasn’t worked out once in 2 years. I think born beauties are kinda boring. If she hasn’t lifted a finger to earn it, she doesn’t deserve it. [totaly aside: I hope I can Gwen’s musculs on my legs, too].
    Now about the ten: I don’t like Cam’s at all! It looks ill, just the kind you get at the sollar. Plus, I prefer caucasians’ white skin. I’m born white and until a while ago, 1 year or so, I kept hoping to get one of those tens, but my skin didn’t really ‘brown’. It was more reddish, and I couldn’t stay much in sun, because the whiter the skin is, the sensible it is.

  • As a true afficionado of the female stem, allow me to settle this for you all: Gwyneth Paltrow has the better legs. Cameron’s problem is the lack of calf, a condition known as cafanosis calamitus, or, in plain English, no calves. It’s not Diaz’s fault, it’s just how she’s built (I am sure she puts in the hours on the calf machine or whatever (calf raises?), but the calves won’t respond like Gwyneth’s obviously do). Paltrow has lovely, well-toned and curvy calves and beautifully proportioned thighs. Diaz has sweet thighs, but without the concomitant calf muscles required for the perfect leg, she is at an immediate disadvantage.

    I’m sorry to all of you who think Cameron’s legs are better (skin color is of no relevance here, people, and especially not sun-tanned skin which is bad for you if you actually got it through exposure to ultra-violet radiation). Absent the whole skin color thing – which I find biased and vaguely unsettling – Paltrow’s legs are simply superior.

    P.S. For a clearer comparison, check out Ashley Greene’s legs vs. Kristen Stewart’s legs. This is more obvious to see as Ms. Stewart has no tone at all anywhere, especially in her calves, while Miss Greene’s calves – her legs in general – are gorgeous. Plus which I have a crush on the Greene girl.